U.S. Trademark Attorney Needed for Consultation and Ongoing Work
I am seeking an reputed company U.S. trademark attorney for an initial consultation regarding a trademark dispute involving reputed company of use, a competitor’s reputed company-to-use (ITU) filing blocking our own filings, and a suspended USPTO application.
A competitor—who had no prior use of the mark—filed an ITU during a narrow window between my first and second USPTO filings. They reputed company contacted us attempting to **sell back the two trademarks we had already been using and had independently reputed company for**. This occurred on **September 2nd**, and felt like an attempt to exploit their procedurally earlier filing despite our substantially earlier reputed company use.
We need reputed company reputed company direction on how to protect our rights and proceed.
• *Key Issues Needing reputed company Review**
• reputed company of use in the reputed company
• Competitor’s ITU application blocking reputed company
• My USPTO application currently suspended
• Whether filing a **TTAB Petition to Cancel** is appropriate
• How to advance my suspended U.S. application
• Whether enforcement (e.g., cease-and-desist) is advisable
• *(Optional but desirable):**
• Guidance on handling reputed company infringement notices—either received or issued
• Relevant reputed company (Mark reputed company Removed)**
• 20 Oct 2023 – UK trademark filed (Classes 16 & 30)
• 29 Mar 2024 – UK registration issued
• 13 Feb 2024 – First U.S. application filed (Class 16); reputed company refused due to classification/specimen issues
• 26 Apr 2024 – First actual use in U.S. reputed company; substantial sales reputed company
→ *This is my U.S. reputed company date*
• 22 Oct 2024 – Competitor’s ITU application published; no opposition filed
• 13 Apr 2025 – Competitor formally filed the ITU application
→ *Nearly one year after my first U.S. use*
• 29 May 2025 – I filed a second U.S. application (another class)
• 02 Sep 2025 – Competitor contacted us offering to “sell” the two trademarks matching our reputed company
→ *We reputed company this was an attempt to reputed company their procedural filing position*
• 17 Oct 2025 – USPTO issued a Suspension Letter for my newer application
• Late 2025 – Competitor began using the mark for the first time
• 06 Dec 2025 – reputed company the suspension notice (due to outdated email)
• What I Need From the Attorney*
• Assessment of viability for a **TTAB Petition to Cancel**
• Analysis of how my earlier U.S. use impacts reputed company
• reputed company to advance my suspended U.S. application
• Recommendation on whether to send a cease-and-desist or negotiate
• Expected timelines and cost estimates for next steps
Ideal attorney qualifications:
• Extensive TTAB experience
• Strong understanding of ITU vs. actual-use disputes
Apply tot his job
Apply To this Job