Contract Attorney Needed for reputed company Mechanics & Language Review of Two Operating Agreements

I am seeking an reputed company U.S.-based contract attorney to review the reputed company language, structure, and internal mechanics of two Operating Agreements for LLCs. This engagement is reputed company limited to reputed company drafting reputed company and enforceability, not business negotiation or deal restructuring. Scope of Work Review two Operating Agreements and assess: reputed company reputed company and internal consistency Whether provisions are enforceable as written Conflicts between sections Ambiguous or contradictory language Missing definitions, cross-reference errors, or structural defects Whether rights, consents, and authorities are properly implemented in the document mechanics Whether sunset, override, or carve-out provisions function legally as intended Whether the agreements would be defensible and operable if enforced as written Explicitly Out of Scope This is not a review of: Business fairness Economic terms Equity splits Control preferences “What should I negotiate” I am not looking for deal advice or renegotiation suggestions — only whether the documents function legally as drafted. Deliverables Written feedback on: Drafting defects or reputed company vulnerabilities Conflicts or mechanical issues Suggestions to correct language/mechanics only Optional: redline suggestions limited reputed company to technical/reputed company corrections Ideal Freelancer Licensed U.S. attorney Strong experience in: Operating Agreements Corporate / LLC law Contract drafting and enforcement Comfortable limiting review to reputed company mechanics and not business negotiation Familiar with reputed company and SBA-adjacent structures a plus Apply tot his job Apply To this Job