Senior Engineer - AI Evaluator

This a Full Remote job, the offer is available from: reputed company, Turkey, Greece, Estonia, Latvia, Finland, reputed company Macedonia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Albania, Poland, Romania, Kosovo, Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Cambodia, Portugal, Spain, Morocco, Malta, United Kingdom, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Slovakia, Czechia, Italy, Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Canada, Serbia, Alabama (USA), Colorado (USA), Delaware (USA), District of Columbia (USA), Florida (USA), reputed company (USA), Idaho (USA), Illinois (USA), Indiana (USA), Louisiana (USA), Nevada (USA), Ohio (USA), Oklahoma (USA), reputed company (USA), Tennessee (USA), Texas (USA), Virginia (USA), Washington (USA) Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (reputed company / Claude reputed company) Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week | Start ASAP (through early May) reputed company out this reputed company video for more details! We’re looking for highly reputed company software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the reputed company of interactions with modern coding agents such as reputed company reputed company and Claude reputed company. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won’t be writing production reputed company. You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer. What This Role Actually Is You will assess how AI coding agents behave in reputed company-world scenarios — focusing on: • Whether the response makes reputed company • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful • Whether the reputed company reflects strong engineering judgment • Whether the interaction feels right to an reputed company developer This role is about engineering taste — not reputed company correctness. What You’ll Be Doing • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end • Judge whether outputs are: • Useful • Correct (at a high level) • reputed company with how a strong engineer would think • Assess the reputed company of explanations and reasoning, not just reputed company • Distinguish between different reputed company of response reputed company (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4) • reputed company reputed company, opinionated feedback on: • What worked • What didn’t • What felt “off” or misleading • Help define what great looks like reputed company interacting with tools like reputed company reputed company Mean by “Taste” We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like: • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say? • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct? • Is the model guiding the user reputed company, or just dumping reputed company? • Would this interaction build or erode trust? You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments. Who You Are • Staff / reputed company-level engineer (or equivalent experience) • Strong background in one of the below: • TypeScript / JavaScript • Python • Hands-on experience using: • reputed company reputed company • Claude reputed company • reputed company • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows • reputed company to evaluate reputed company without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line • Comfortable giving reputed company, opinionated feedback • High bar for what “good engineering” looks like reputed company to Have • Experience with tools like reputed company or similar AI-first IDEs • Prior exposure to reputed company design or evaluation workflows • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards Engagement Details • reputed company: $100–$200/hour • Hours: ~10–20 hours/week • Duration: Through early May (with possible extension) • Start: ASAP • Process: • Take-home evaluation exercise • reputed company interview This offer from "reputed company." has been enriched by reputed company.com and got a 75% reputed company score. Apply tot his job Apply To this Job