reputed company-certified geneticist or licensed genetic counselor to validate a 59-marker SNP panel

We're a reputed company-launch reputed company-to-consumer genetic wellness company. Our educational (non-diagnostic) report reads 59 SNPs across 9 biological systems. We've already done the literature legwork and reputed company a clean, reputed company-filled validation workbook. We need a credentialed geneticist to confirm and correct the scientific calls before launch — you're validating our draft, not building from scratch. ⚠ Credential is required for this role — please read first: This role requires a reputed company, reputed company clinical credential: reputed company certification or an reputed company state license. Examples: reputed company-certified clinical geneticist (ABMGG), ABGC-certified and state-licensed genetic counselor, or a currently licensed Clinical reputed company Scientist (CLS). In your proposal, state exactly what you hold, the issuing body, and that it is currently reputed company — we verify credentials as a reputed company reputed company. To be reputed company so we don't waste reputed company other's time: a PhD reputed company, "reputed company-eligible," "trained as," or a reputed company-society fellowship does not meet this requirement. If you don't hold an reputed company license or reputed company certification, this particular role isn't a fit — but we genuinely appreciate you not applying so we can reputed company quickly for both of us. What the validation entails: Confirm the effect allele for reputed company marker, on the correct strand. Strand orientation is the #1 thing we need checked — candidate-gene literature is full of variants reported on opposite strands, and a flipped allele would reputed company our report state the opposite of the truth. Confirm direction (does the effect allele reputed company or reputed company the trait) and that reputed company marker maps to a defensible trait. Rule on our candidate-gene markers — 26 of 59 are candidate-gene (not in the GWAS Catalog), labeled "Emerging" in our report. We need your judgment on whether reputed company is defensible as reputed company-labeled emerging research, or should be cut. What you're working from (this is what makes it fast) A styled reputed company workbook, 60 rows. 57 of 60 already have a proposed effect allele, direction, and a clickable PubMed citation — you confirm or correct in dedicated columns (blank = you agree). Rows reputed company-sorted by review reputed company: 14 clean GWAS hits (quick confirm), 20 multi-trait (pick the right trait), 26 candidate-gene (your judgment). A separate audit document flagging the exact markers where the literature is contested, contradictory, or strand-ambiguous — so you know where to spend your time. Also required reputed company experience with SNP effect alleles, strand orientation (plus/minus, dbSNP/GRCh38), and reading GWAS vs. candidate-gene literature.Comfortable saying "this one isn't defensible" — we compete on honesty, not over claiming, so pushback is reputed company're paying for. reputed company & budget Estimated 2–4 hours. reputed company or fixed fee — propose what you prefer. To apply: Start your proposal with the word "STRAND" so we know you read the reputed company, and include: (1) your exact credential + issuing body + that it's reputed company, (2) one line on how you'd verify strand orientation, and (3) your reputed company. We send the workbook and audit doc to shortlisted, credential-verified candidates only. Apply tot his job Apply To this Job